eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

US residents, Canadian University students

Dear Mr. Ingram,

I heard about you from a friend and I am writing to get your advice on filing our US/Canada taxes.

My husband is Canadian and I have permernant residence card.
He started to work in the States from April, 2005 and I joined him Mar. 2006.
We paid our Canada taxes for 2005 and my question is do we pay Canada tax for 2006? In 2006, my husband and I were both registered to universities in Toronto. He graduated in Dec. 2006.

Another question is that if we want you to file our taxes for us, how long do you think it will take? We are in Seattle, not so far from you.

Thanks and you have a good weekend.


david ingram replies:


It is tax time, I will be working all weekend but did manage to sneak out to the midnight showing of the movie 300 this morning with five teenagers and had a great time although it sure left me tired today..

As I am sure you realize, your PR card remains valid as long as you are living outside of Canada with a Canadian spouse. You do NOT need to worry about coming back to Canada for regular visits, do NOT ned to file any paperwork other than to renew the card after five years and do NOT have to file a Canadian tax return to keep it alive as the hoklder of a US Green Card must do.

If you worked in Canada from Jan to Mar 2006, you will have to file a Canadian return. It does not sound like your husband has to file a Canadian tax return unless he (and you) wish to file returns to carry forward your tuition and education amounts in Canada in case you come back in the future.

We have a four or five day turnaround at the moment for US / Caanda tax returns. Happy to look after the Canadian and US returns.

Send them to the following address.

david ingram
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Ingram's US / Canada Services
US / Canada / Mexico tax, Immigration and working Visa Specialists
US / Canada Real Estate Specialists
My Home office is at:
4466 Prospect Road
North Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7N 3L7
Cell (604) 657-8451 -
(604) 980-0321 Fax (604) 980-0325

Calls welcomed from 10 AM to 9 PM 7 days a week Vancouver (LA) time - (please do not fax or phone outside of those hours as this is a home office)
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

flipping homes - deductions and taxes

QUESTION: Hi,
If we buy a fixer-upper to renovate and flip without renting it out what are the allowable expenses for deductions?
Thanks

____________________________________________________________________
david ingram replies:

In general anything you spend to do the fixing is a deduction from the final sale profit. This would include but is not limited to:

materials, subcontractors, legal, accounting, real estate commissions, surveyors, appraisals, interest on the mortgage, interest on a building loan, interest on material loans (maybe because you used a credit card to buy), truck expenses to get supplies and transport tools, afvertising, utilities, photography, landscaping, trash removal, dumping fees, building permits, architects fees, engineering fees, home inspection fees, insurance, helpers, etc.

Remember that any profit is taxable at straight income rates on line 135. Flipping or renovating does NOT create capital gains tax. The following older Questions will explain that a bit.

______________________________________________________________________
DAVID

A "friend" who is a BC realtor and has the flipping question presented to her
from time to time recently attended a seminar that was related to this
subject. As a result she was able to provide me with some interesting
thoughts to ponder concerning "intent" and "professional background" when it comes to "flipping houses"
and tax in Canada. You may possibly be looked at as a Developer all the
subsequent implications.

Read the full article at <http://tax.centa.com/comment.php?mode=view&cid=8>;

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

david ingram replies:

In Canada, the purchase and sale of any piece of real estate with or without
renovations is considered a sale and subject to straight income tax unless:

1. It was bought for and clearly used as your personal residence and was
intended to be used for an indefinite period of time which is usually in the
five to ten year range.

2. It was bought as and used as a recreational property

3. It was bought for the purposes of earning long term rental income.

In the case number 1, there is no tax.

In the case of numbers 2 and 3, the sale is treated as a capital gain and
only fifty per cent of the profit is taxed at your regular tax rates.

Lots of / many (anyone caught) are taxed full tax rates when they buy a
house, move in, fix it up and sell it a year or two later and then do
another one.

Of course, most are NOT caught in these circumstances.

However, "any" flip is going to be straight income unless the person can
prove that they bought it to live in and then:

* married a person with three children and it is not big enough (had to sell
and bought bigger)

* were transferred to another city (had to sell to buy in new city)

* lost their job, were injured, etc. and can no longer afford to move in. In
this case, they would have to show that they had the finances to have paid
for it when they bought it. (Not only can they not afford it but they have
moved into their parents' basement (boomeranged).

* Inherited a house from their parents and do not need it any more. (are
living in the new house)

You can read more by going to www.centa.com - click on tax guide in the top
left hand corner and then click on the "capital gain" section.

david

This older q & A also gives an idea

My daughter is closing on a presale Yaletown condominium this summer. She
is working until Christmas in Alberta. She returns to Vancouver from Jan to
May and if the job becomes a full time position, then she may return to
Alberta to live. At the time of presale, February 2004, we thought that the
suite would be assigned to her and that she would live in the suite.

I was hoping that she could declare the suite as her permanent residence
since she is only renting in Alberta and the work is not permanent. In
May 2007, she could decide to keep or sell the suite.

What does she need to do in order to qualify the suite as her permanent
residence?

-----------------------------------------

david ingram replies:

There is no absolute answer because you can call a toad a frog all day long
but it is still a toad.

To be a principal residence and tax free for income tax purposes, the
property must have been bought by her to live in and she HAS TO move into
it. - No exceptions that I know of.

You can expect that the CRA will be looking at "every" quick resale in EVERY
downtown building.

In deciding if it is a capital gain or a flip, the CRA will be looking at
the suitability of the unit as a residence, the ability to pay for the unit
and past and even future performance.

In other words if she claimed this one as a principal residence and then did
it again a year later, the CRA would have every right to go back and
reclassify the first one.
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

Canadian resident selling six rentals in great Britain - UK

QUESTION: MY SON IS A CANADIAN RESIDENT AND HAS SOLD SOME RENTED FLATS THAT HE HAS OWNED FOR 10 YEARS IN THE UK,HE HAS BEEN A CANADIAN CITIZEN FOR SIX YEARS.WILL HE HAVE TO PAY CAPITAL GAINS TAX ON HIS PROPERTY SALE IN THE UK OR CANADA.IF HE HAS TO PAY IN CANADA AT WHAT PERCENTAGE RATE WILL HE BE CHARGED

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
david ingram replies:

Any capital gain is taxable in Canada from the day he became a Canadian resident, not from the day he became a citizen.

So, if he paid $500,000 for them and they were worth $600,000 the day he came to Canada, and he sold them for $1,000,000 today, his UK capital gain would be $500,000 and his Canadian capital gain would be $400,000.

Canada taxes 1/2 of a capital gain so he would owe tax on $200,000. Every province has different tax rates so the following is just approximate. BC, for instance has 6 progressive rates starting at about 22% on the first $35,000 and topping at about 43% over $130,000

Because the six rentals were not his residence before he left, they will be taxable in the UK first.

He will get credit in Canada on line 431 Schedule 1 of his Canadian return for the tax paid to the UK.

The following might help as well
______________________________

My_question_is: Applicable to Another Jurisdiction or Multi-jurisdictions
Subject: UK Capital Gains tax on UK Property Sale
Expert: [email protected]
Date: Friday March 02, 2007
Time: 09:31 AM -0500

QUESTION:

Hi - I am a British citizen who has been resident in the US for 11 years, and a green card holder for 8 years. I have a property in the UK which I am considering selling. I have rented it out since I left, and have been paying tax in the US on the rental proceeds. I gather that I will have to pay capital gains tax in the US if I sell it. Will the UK Inland Revenue also expect me to pay capital gains tax on the sale? (It would seem a little unfair to have to pay twice!)
Thanks for your help.

___________________________________________
david ingram replies:

The property is taxable in the US and may be taxable in the UK first. If it is, the tax will be credited to you US tax by filing form 1116. This reply to a Canadian will give you a heads up.
--------------------------------------------



My_question_is: Canadian-specific
Subject: Tax on property sale in UK
Expert: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday January 24, 2007
Time: 10:25 AM -0500

QUESTION:

I hold both Canadian and British citizenship. I own property in the UK (I
have owned an apartment for about 15 years)and was wondering about the tax
situation, both in the UK and Canada, if I were to sell the property there.
-------------------------------
david ingram replies:

The UK is similar to Canada in terms of selling a principal residence.

I can also claim a British Passport but at 64 I am not likely to do so at
this time.

I know that if (always a non-resident) I had bought the house as an
investment, I would not owe any tax to the UK but would to Canada.

In the case of a house that you used to live in, it can be subject to UK
private residence tax relief if you lived in it before you left and can not
return because of job circumstances for either spouse.

If it is just an investment property, it is likely taxable. It does not
matter much though because the tax will be lower than the Canadian tax and
it "IS" taxable in Canada - the tax paid to the UK will be a tax credit in
Canada on lines 431 and 433 of the Canadian T1.

I suggest that you need to talk to a UK accountant or maybe the Inland
Revenue itself.

You can also find out a bit by reading


http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/Taxes/TaxOnPropertyAndRental
Income/DG_4020890

Do me a favour and let me know the answer if you find out.

This will be going out to another 13,000 people and someone may write back
with the answer. If so i will forward it to you.
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

NR4 received in error

QUESTION:

Hello. I moved back to Canada late in 2005 and duly advised my banks that I was once again a resident of Canada so that they could stop taxing me 10% each month off of my earned interest.

The banks goofed and both deducted 10% for one to three months and issued me an NR4.

Can I get this money back? What do I do with the NR4s? Can I indicate the taxes paid when I file my return?

thanks for your advice.

_______________________________________________________

david ingram replies:

No problem - happens all the time -

Put the amount of interest received on schedule 4 of your T1 tax return and include the amount of tax deducted on the NR4 on line 437 (total income tax dedcuted) along with any other tax deducted.

Do NOT EFILE.

Send in a paper copy and include copies of your NR-4 slips.
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

Moving from Detroit to Windsor

David,

I am a U.S. citizen and resident, married to a (non-working) dual U.S.-Canadian citizen. I recently learned that the company where I've worked for the last 20+ years is closing its doors near the end of this year. I'm 55 and can't get my pension for at least 5 years...10 years if I want a full pension. We've been thinking of the idea of moving across the border to Canada (wife would sponser me), and I have a question. Would it make any sense tax-wise for me to live and work in Canada, pay into CPP for 5 or 10 years? I understand that Canadian taxes are higher than in Michigan, and I have mutual funds and other savings that are generating about $10,000 in yearly interest/dividends/capital gains that I would be leaving in the U.S.

Thanks,

________________________________________________________________
david ingram replies:

As an esoteric exercise, I decided to see what the difference actually was because Canadian taxes are NOT always higher than the US, particularly where two spouses have equal earnings.

The big difference is that the US has a joint tax return rate and when one spouse works an the other does not, a discrepancy does arise.

I used a US salary of $60,000 and a joint 1040 and MI 1040.

I did not use any deductions other than the standard deduction and did not claim for any children.

The results were

US fed tax of 5.714
MI tax of 2,083
FICA 3,720
Medicare 870
For a total of 12,387 which converts to $14,048.02 in Canadian funds
If you had lived in Detroit, the city tax would be $1,470 changing the figures to
a total of $13,857.00 US or $15,715.14 Canadian

I converted the $60,000 to $68,045.62 Canadian

The results were
Cdn Fed tax of 9,581.69
ON tax of 4,659.14
CPP of 1,910.70
EI of 729.30
for a total of 16,880.83 which converts to $14,884.86 in US funds

The difference is $2,497.86 or about $200 a month. if you did not move from a Michigan city with a tax return or a difference of (14,884.86 - 13,857) $1,027.86 if you moved from Detroit

Then - (I was intrigued) I tried it with you both receiving $30,000 US


The results were

US fed tax of 5.714
MI tax of 2,083
FICA 3,720
Medicare 870
For a total of 12,387 which converts to $14,048.02 in Canadian funds
and $1,470 Detroit tax 'IF' There is no change

Then I decided to show what would happen to a couple who moved to Canada and both worked equally.

I converted the $60,000 to $68,045.62 Canadian but split it into 2 returns of $34,022.81

The results were
Cdn Fed tax of 3,474.97 x's 2 or 6,949.94
ON tax of 1,721.67 x's 2 or 3,443.34
CPP of 1,510.88 x's 2 or 3,021.76
EI of 636.23 x's 2 or 1,272 .45
for a total of 14,687.49 which converts to $12,950.86 in US funds

and is only a difference of 12,950.86 - 12,387 or $563.86 or less than $50.00 a month AND qualifies your wife for her own CPP.

Of course, if you moved from Detroit to Windsor, you would be paying ($13,857 - 12,950.86) $906.14 LESS living in Canada.

For the record, I would normally charge a minimum of $400 Cdn for this 'what if' calculation and your question was rejected originally along with another 100 or so. However, it caught my eye and I decided to use it as a major answer.

The investment part of your income will also cause some differences because Canada will tax the dividends and capital gains differently,likely a little more. However, if you switched your accounts to Canadian securities, the tax may be a little less because of Canada's dividend tax credit.
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

Moving back into Rental house section 45(2) 45(3) deemed disposition

My question is: Canadian-specific

QUESTION: Hi David,

I am a Canadian citizen. However, from March 2000 to Nov 2004, my family and I became non residents while I worked overseas. During the period that we were overseas we rented our home in a long term lease agreement. When we returned to reside in Canada we purchased another home to live in and we have continued to rent our original house. Could you please explain how capital gains will be handled? Do we need to file anything forms with CRA prior to selling the rental house? Also, how would capital gains be handled if we sell our current personal residence and move back into the rental house?

Best regards,

________________________________________________________________
david ingram replies:

The first house has incurred capital gains tax from the moment you left the country. Although it is possible to rent a house out for 4 years and claim it capital gains tax free by filing an election under section 45(2), this does NOT apply to non-residents. We have had a couple of cases lately where the capital gains tax on the house is more than the tax saved bt becoming a non-resident for three or four years because the houses went up so much in value.

I am assuming here that the second house you are living in has increased in value more than the rental since you returned and it should be your principal residence for that time because it would have been possible to declare the rental capital gains tax free after your return by filing the election.

Deemed Disposition!

Moving in to a rental house 'triggers' the capital gains right now although it does not have to be paid right now. The capital gains is calculated on schedule 3 an dthe amount put on line 127 of the T1 General Canadian Tax return. You then make an election to defer payimng the tax until actual sale under section 45(3) and deduct the line 127 amount on line 256.

This older question will likely help you understand it.


QUESTION:

We have moved out of country for job reasons and now look to return to
Canada. Before leaving we tried to sell our home and were unable. For the
last 10 years we have been renting it. We plan to move back into and then
sell it. What must we do in order to avoid paying capital gains tax.

Dan

PS We did not know that we could have declared it our principal residence
as we moved for job reasons and thus, did not do that!
====================================================================
david ingram replies:

When you moved out of Canada, you should have done a departing Canada return
and filled in either a T1161 or the former form (number escapes me a t ithe
moment) to declare assets left behind.

At any rate, if you became a non-resident of Canada from your job move,
there is no exemption from capital gains tax on the increased value of the
house unless you were a deemed or factual resident of Canada while you were
gone. A deemed or factual resident status can apply to people who are
working on CIDA projects, are members of the armed forces, are members of a
Canadian Diplomatic mission, working for the United Nations and a couple of
other esoteric items covered by Regulation 3400.

Your Belgian email address makes most of these possibilities unlikely.

In addition, you would have had to report your earned income to Canada every
year and I presume that you did not do that but did file a Section 216(4)
rental return to report the rent received.

A further complication is that if you returned to Canada and bought another
house which you moved into, there would not be an immediate tax bill but if
you move into the rental house, it is deemed to have been sold and you (and
your spouse if joint) owe tax on the increased value.

Fortunately, under section 45(3) of the Canadian Income tax act, you can
notify the CRA (Revenue Canada when you left 10 years ago) that: I hereby
elect under section 45(3) of the Income Tax Act to defer the payment of tax
on the residence at XXX your street, until the actual sale. Attach a
proforma Schedule 3 to calculate the profit and then pay it when you
actually sell the house.

In other words, if your intention was to move in for a short time to try and
make it tax free, you are just doubling your moving expenses and increasing
your accounting and legal fees.

If the idea is to move into a new house on your return, you are better off
to sell the one you have first and buy the new one
before you come back so that you have the most capital freed up to buy the
next house and move directly.

- Incidentally - If you decided to keep the old one as a rental and borrow
money against it to use to purchase the new one, the interest on the
borrowed money is NOT deductible against the rental income even though the
mortgage is registered against the rental house because the money was USED
to buy the personal residence you are about to occupy.

You can learn more about this by reading CRA Bulletin IT-533 at:
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pub/tp/it533/it533-e.pdf

You can find out more about interest as a deduction by reading my November
2001 newsletter by going to www.centa.com, clicking on newsletters in the
top left box, click on 2001 and click on November.
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

Filing form T1135 late to report out of country investments

My question is: Canadian-specific

QUESTION: Dear Sir/Madam:

I trust that I am directing this query to the correct person.

My wife and I have had the same Certified General Accountant filing personal income taxes for my wife and myself for the past five years. We have had a rental property in the U.S. for some time and along with filing the regular Personal Income Tax my accountant has submitted a T1135 Foreign Income Verification Statement.

Last April 26th on filing our Personal Income Tax Forms our accountant gave us a our copy of the files. Later at home upon reviewing these files my wife noted that the T1135 Foreign Income Verification Statement has not been signed by myself. She called our accountant to query this and to ask if the form had been submitted to Revenue Canada on our behalf. The accountant advised her that the signing of this form had been overlooked and asked that one of us come in to his office to sign the form and he would submit it to Revenue Canada. My wife who has my Power of Attorney attended at the office of said accountant on May 5/2006 and after signing the T1135 was advised that the form would be sent off to Rev. Canada. However, although signed on May 5th, 2006 it appears that Form T1135 was not sent until Sept 15, 2006! This we were not aware of until this year 2007.

We were away on from our home in December & January and upon returning and picking up our mail from Canada Post there was a Notice from Revenue Canada advising us of the late filing of Form T1135 and advising us of a late penalty of $2,500.00 plus interest of $137.40. This was the first and only notice we had received from Revenue Canada. My wife immediately phoned our accountant to query this and was asked to send a Fax copy of Revenue Canada's Notice to his office; which she did.

In the past my wife and I have complied with all neccessary requirements for Income Tax filing and do not feel that we should be penalized for the oversight and/or neligence of our accountant and/or his staff.

Our accountant has advised us that Revenue Canada has never in past history given a penalty on the late submission of FORM T1135........and that is the first time Revenue Canada has done so. He does not appear willing to intervene with Revenue Canada on our behalf and has suggested that we attend at the office of our local Member of Parliament and see what he can do to alleviate this matter.

My Questions to you are:
1. What responsibility does our accountant have in this matter?
2. Since it was our accountant who was late filing this document shouldn't he be the one to contact Revenue Canada on our behalf ?
3. What recourse is available to me to cover this loss (We are both pensioner's and $2,637.40 is a great deal of money in our financial position)
4 Would our accountant's errors and omissions insurance cover this fee?

I anxiously await your response and thank you in advance.

Sincerely,


______________________________________

david ingram replies:

This is the first year that I have seen Revenue Canada issue a fine for form T1135 and I have only seen one. In that case, the client was clearly late by bringing his return with a refund in at the end of August as he has done for years. I thought it patently unfair that the fine was levied and filed a request for its cancellation with the Fairness Committee. I have not yet received a reply. The due date for the T1135 is April 30th, even if the person is self employed and his or her return not due until June 15th.

Your accountant is correct in that this is the first year and he or she had no particular reason to think that there would be a fine.

At the same time, if you signed it clearly on May 5th, it should have been sent at that time.

TWO THINGS

One From the sounds of it, the T1135 went in unsigned with the original return. Under those circumstances, I believe that the Fairness Committee would cancel the penalty. Get your Accountant top write a request.

Two I do not see any reference to your having filed your US 1040 and a state return if in a taxing state. Failure to file the 1040NR can result in $10,000 penalties for failure to file PLUS 30% of the gross rent collected on a US rental property. If you have not filed your US returns because you were losing money and someone told you that it was not required if you were losing money, you need to get that fixed right away.

That, of course, is what we do.

I have not addressed the responsibility of the accountant in this specific case because I have only one side and I still remember an inappropriate comment made by Judge Brenda Brown when she had only heard one side in a divorce case.
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

Part II - non-resident taxes for Canadian in South Korea

david ingram says:
>
> In re-reading my reply here, I realized that I left out tax on any dividends or interest received. Under Article X of the Canada / Korea Tax Treaty, Canada receives 15% tax on any interest paid out by Canaccord Capital to his account. My reply was based upon his ownership of mining stocks which on the Vancouver Stock Exchange rarely pay out dividends or interest. There is no tax on the sale of publicly traded shares unless the seller owns 50% of the company.
>
> This applies to just about any other country with a tax treaty. If there is no tax treaty, the withholding rate would be 25% on interest and dividends.
>
> The original question and answer follows:
>
> QUESTION:
>
> Hello, I'm a registered non-resident Canadian living and
> working in South Korea. I've been a non-resident for
> about 8 years now and about 3 years ago I opened up an
> account at Canaccord Capital, Vancouver so I could build
> up a portfolio of mining stocks. Hypothetically, if I was to
> make a million dollars and cash out, my Canadian
> stockbroker said he could send the million dollars (minus
> his commissions of course) to me in Korea without taking
> any tax off. My broker said he could send the full amount
> but he couldn't answer any questions related to my tax
> liability in Canada. So my question is, 'do I have to pay
> taxes on profits made on Canadian stock exchanges as a
> Canadian non-resident living in South Korea. If I have to
> pay substantial taxes, is there anything I can legally do to
> reduce these taxes? Thank you.
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
> david ingram replies
>
> Non-residents of Canada do NOT pay tax on profits in the trading of Publicly
> Traded shares on Canadian Stock Exchanges.
>
> Non-residents of the US do NOT pay tax on profits in the trading of publicly traded shares on US stock exchanges UNLESS they are US citizens..
>
> However, if you were to be participating in seed shares of a private corporation, the profits would be taxable.
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> David Ingram's US / Canada Services
> US / Canada / Mexico tax, Immigration and working Visa Specialists
> US / Canada Real Estate Specialists
> My Home office is at:
> 4466 Prospect Road
> North Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7N 3L7
> Cell (604) 657-8451 -
> (604) 980-0321 Fax (604) 980-0325
>
> Calls welcomed from 10 AM to 10 PM 7 days a week Vancouver (LA) time - (please do not fax or phone outside of those hours as this is a home office)
>
> email to [email protected]
> www.centa.com www.david-ingram.com
>
> Disclaimer: This question has been answered without detailed information or consultation and is to be regarded only as general comment. Nothing in this message is or should be construed as advice in any particular circumstances. No contract exists between the reader and the author and any and all non-contractual duties are expressly denied. All readers should obtain formal advice from a competent and appropriately qualified legal practitioner or tax specialist for expert help, assistance, preparation, or consultation
>
> David Ingram gives expert income tax & immigration help to non-resident Americans & Canadians from New York to California to Saudi Arabia to Mexico to China or Chile - Cross border, dual citizen - out of country investments are all handled with competence & authority.
>
>
eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

Student Loans - collection agencies - bankruptcy

The question that prompted this is furher on!

This arrived with some 7,000 other emails while I was away at a wedding in Winnipeg.

I apologize for not acknowledging it sooner. There is no way out of your student loan other than bankruptcy or paying it off.

I likley know of 50 people being chased at the moment. Without exception, they are being treated poorly by the collection office. I tried to make an offer to the collection office for one person twice and did not receive the courtesy of a "get Lost" reply. You did a little better with the Prime Minster's office.

The following may help. It was publishd in the Western Investor in February, 2004 - I wrote it about me. The Western Investor Article did not contain a lawyer's name - I used Murray Morisson in Surrey at 200-10351 150th Street, Phone 604-930-9013 - He is a very real specialist in bankruptcy law.

I did not use a trustee because I was put into bankruptcy by the CRA and to my knowledge am the only Canadian ever put into bankruptcy by the CRA. If I was going to do it myself, I would use Gerry Foran at Sands and Company (604) 684-3030.

The CRA used Deloitte and Company an organization which left a vile taste in my mouth. Although the support staff were pleasant, they mised the mortgage on the house in their report even though it was in my declaration. When I pointed that fact out, the principal arrogantly told me I was lying about the mortgage my wife had been paying for 17 years that he had personally checked and it did not exist. But the silliest thing was that earlier, when the principal walked in to the room in his immaculate suit, immaculate hair, and 'haute' attitude. He literally looked down his nose at me and said, "Mr Ingram, aren't you ashamed to be here?" That was the first of many mistakes made. The funny part was that I wasn't ashamed or embarrassed at all. I was relieved that the whole mess was about to go away. Some one had finally made the decision for me. I have been able to help many people make the decision since.

From the tone of your letter, I bet that you should consider bankruptcy. This is the Western Investor article.


BANKRUPTCY – or How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World

I have just received my discharge from bankruptcy. It isn’t completely over. I have to pay $800 a month for 36 months starting on Feb 7th, but that is a lot better than the $4,853,000 income tax bill that started it with no assets.

Well there “were” family assets. But over a period of 21 years I went from a positive “paper” net worth of $4,800,000 to a negative $4,800,000 because of an income tax bill that I fought in court and lost and then got stubborn.

If I had to do it again, I would have walked into a bankruptcy trustee’s office 15 years ago and would have been able to get on with my life. Instead I got stubborn and decided I would go to my grave owing the CCRA as much as the tax bill increased to before I died.

So the house was in my wife’s name, the cars were in my wife’s name, the motorhome was in my wife’s name and the business was in my wife’s name. I owned nothing and was quite enjoying the position. After all, what else could anybody do? Well, there was one thing someone could do. In the middle of the bankruptcy my wife left (with all the assets) but that is another article.

Thankfully, the CCRA finally gave up on collecting it and hired a trustee to put me into bankruptcy. I understand that I might be the first person that the CCRA put into receivership in Canada. No trustee I have talked to had ever handled a receivership where the CCRA had put an individual into bankruptcy. Oh sure, there were thousands where a taxpayer had declared bankruptcy because of a tax bill. But no one knows of an individual out into bankruptcy by the CCRA.

Now you have to know that I have sent a couple of hundred people to go bankrupt over the years. Their situation was hopeless and bankruptcy was the only solution. And I had even had an appointment to see a bankruptcy trustee on July 22, 1999 but luckily, broke my arm and leg in a motorcycle accident the week before and never made the appointment. But I should have rescheduled and got on with my life three years earlier because it took the CCRA three more years to put me into bankruptcy and I could have done something with those three years. You see, this article is meant to encourage you to see a trustee and pull the plug if you are fighting a losing battle, particularly if the major creditor is the CCRA.

If you have money problems for any reason that could include divorce, separation, unexpected tax penalty, leaky condo, company downsizing, illness, an accident or any combination of the above, you will need help.

That help may be as simple as taking an adult education course in family finances at your local high school. Most adult education courses include such a course and even though I taught them for years, it did not keep "me" out of that $5,000,000 bankruptcy after three of the above events occurred.

If you need more immediate help and you happen to live in Greater Vancouver, contact a credit counselor. There are lots around. Look in the Yellow Pages. If you want a referral, send me a request to [email protected].

As one credit counsellor's pamphlet suggests;

"Budgeting involves more than just arithmetic. It takes determination. People experiencing financial difficulties need objective, unbiased neutral information."

That statement applies to your finances when you have an income and bad spending habits. It does not cover the financial disasters that I seem to see on a daily basis. I am talking about the $186,000 income tax reassessment for something that happened five years ago. I am talking about the leaky condominium crisis where the debt is $100,000 and you would have to earn $190,000 and pay $90,000 income tax to have $100,000 left and that is not counting interest accruing while you are doing it.

In this case, you need to consult competent help that does NOT start with a bankruptcy trustee, a night school course, a credit counselor or an accountant.

Now, you need a lawyer and not "just" any lawyer. You need a lawyer like mine who specializes in Bankruptcy law and will work for you and give you and your family the advice it needs to preserve any assets possible and tell you what you can do and cannot do.

BUT, why not save a couple of dollars and go directly to the trustee.

The simple fact is that the trustee does NOT work for you. When you sign that paper, the trustee that you searched out, the trustee that you found in the yellow pages, the trustee your banker, hairdresser, mechanic, best friend or worst enemy recommended is not working for "you".

The trustee is working for the creditors. Their job is to get the most for the creditors following local federal, state or provincial guidelines that have different limits in each province and each state.

To access all these limits click on the best site I know of: http://www.bankruptcycanada.com

British Columbia Exemptions are for instance:

Equity in a home in Greater Vancouver and Victoria = $ 12,000. In the rest of the province = $ 9,000;
* Equity in Household items = $ 4,000;
* Equity in a Vehicle = $ 5,000; The vehicle exemption drops to $2,000 if the debtor is behind on child care payments (to facilitate the enforcement of Maintenance Orders)
* Equity in work tools = $ 10,000;
*
Equity in essential clothing and medical aids is unlimited

Alberta shows its agrarian roots with much larger exemptions as follows:

Food required by the debtor and his/her dependants during the next 12 months;
* Necessary clothing of the debtor and his/her dependants up to a value of $4,000;
* Household furniture and appliances up to a value of $4,000;
* One motor vehicle not exceeding a value of $5000.00;
* Medical and dental aids required by the debtor and his/her dependants;
* Where the debtor is a bona fide farmer and whose principal source of livelihood is farming 160 acres if the debtor's principal residence is located on that 160 acres and that the 160 acres is part of the debtor's farm;
* The equity in the debtor's principal residence, including a mobile home, up to a value of $40,000.00;
* If the debtor is a co-owner of the residence, the amount of the exemption is reduced to an amount that is proportionate to the debtor's ownership interest;
* Personal property (i.e. tools, equipment, books) required by the debtor to earn income from the debtor's occupation up to a value of $10,000;
* Where the debtor's primary income is from farming operations, personal property required by the debtor for the proper and efficient conduct of the debtor's farming operations for the next 12 months.
*
Saskatchewan Exemptions and agrarian routes are even more generous:

For Non-Farmers:

Household furniture and personal effects to a value of $4,500 per person;
* Tools of the trade to a value of $4,500;
* A motor vehicle, if required for employment;
* $32,000 equity in your home ($64,000 if jointly owned);
* Certain life insurance policies;
* RRSPs, RRIFs and DPSPs are exempt from seizure (effective March 4, 2003);
* Certain pensions.
*
For Farmers:

Furniture, furnishings and appliances to a value of $10,000;
* The cash equivalent of produce sufficient to provide food and fuel for heating until the next harvest;
* All livestock, farm machinery and equipment, including one car or truck, necessary for the next twelve months operations;
* One motor vehicle, if required for business or profession, but not in addition to the one above;
* Tools and equipment to a value of $4,500 used by a farmer in his trade or profession;
* Equity in personal residence to a value of $32,000 ($64,000 if jointly owned);
* Seed grain equal to two bushels per acre of land under cultivation;
* RRSPs, RRIFs and DPSPs are exempt from seizure (effective March 4, 2003);
* Cash equivalent of crop equal to:
* unpaid harvesting costs;
* living expenses to next harvest;
* necessary costs of farming until next harvest.
The homestead;
* Certain life insurance policies;
* Certain pensions
*
MANITOBA Exemptions are a little light:

Furniture, household furnishings and appliances not exceeding total value of $4,500;

Necessary and ordinary clothing of the debtor and family;
* Food and fuel necessary to family for period of six months or cash equivalent;
* If debtor is a farmer:
* animals necessary for farming operation for 12 months;
* farm machinery, dairy utensils and farm equipment necessary for ensuing 12 months;
* one motor vehicle if required for purposes of agricultural operations.
* Home quarter.
* Tools, implements, professional books and other necessaries not exceeding a total value of $7,500 used in practice of trade, occupation or profession;
* One motor vehicle, if necessary for work or transportation to and from work, not exceeding $3,000 in value;
* Articles and furniture necessary to performance of religious services;
* Seed sufficient to seed all land of debtor under cultivation;
* Health aids, including wheelchair, air conditioner, elevator, hearing aid, eye glasses, prosthetic or orthopaedic equipment, necessary to debtor or family;
* Chattel property of municipalities and schools;
* Actual residence of the bankrupt, equity of $1,500 each if in joint tenancy, or $2,500 if not in joint tenancy.
*


Talk to a bankruptcy lawyer first. If you want a reference, email me at [email protected]. Get your law straight. Learn what you get to keep and what the limits are. In BC for instance you can have $5,000 equity in a car. However, The Bank of Nova Scotia (for one) will insist on seizing your car even if you have never missed a payment if the car loan is with them. Arranging for someone else to take over the loan before you go bankrupt could make the transition easier.

Other assets you can keep (for a total of $31,000 if they all exist are:

I advised one lady client to go bankrupt at this time last year for a $140,000 tax bill (which was unjust, unfair and illegal in my opinion) that we had fought for two years. (Canada decided to tax her retroactively on her income for five years even though she was an American living in the states. They decided she spent too much time in Canada and she had since moved to Canada officially - Bankruptcy was the only way to get rid of it and start over.)

I was blindsided by the Bank of Nova Scotia's new policy of not allowing anyone to keep a car. Luckily, a friend paid out the bank and loaned her the money and she kept her car. It would have been far easier if we had known that in advance. Her Bankruptcy Trustee was blind sided as well. It was also the first one he had seen.

After you have made a decision, you need a trustee. Remember, they are all working for your creditors.

The best site I know of to get information about trustees is at: http://www.bankruptcycanada.com. If you can't make up your mind, send me an email to [email protected] and I will give you someone in your area.

Trustees might not like me saying this but you do not even need money to go bankrupt. The trustee can be paid from your assets, tax refund or might not even get paid until after the bankruptcy. While I was actually writing this, another client who I had sent to go bankrupt came in to return some material I had loaned him. I said thank you and suggested that he must have his discharge by now. He did not have it. He only had a conditional discharge because he still owes the trustee $1,500 which he expects to have very soon. Another client is in the same position. However, they do not have a dozen creditors phoning looking for money.

Hope this helps. Remember - see the lawyer first - before you see the trustee. And only talk to a lawyer who deals regularly with bankruptcy and appears in court for bankrupts protecting their rights. That means one in 100 lawyers. There is little chance that a lawyer you are already dealing with would be the one you would use because a bankruptcy lawyer is likely too busy to do anything else.

david ingram [email protected] www.centa.com

eMail Article To a Friend View Printable Version

Taxation of Dual-Status (Australian-US) Alien

My_question_is: Applicable to Another Jurisdiction or Multi-jurisdictions
Subject: Taxation of Dual-Status (Australian-US) Alien
Expert: [email protected]
Date: Monday March 12, 2007
Time: 04:39 PM -0500

QUESTION:

Hi, I am an Australian citizen holding a US green card and have been working in the US since Jun05. I have some questions regarding my income/losses from my assets in Australia (investment property and shares) due to my permanent residency in the US. I’m not sure how it would work, considering I am a resident in the US but a citizen in Australia and by law I have to lodge my tax return in both countries. Do I have to report my losses/income in my Australian tax return or by law I have to also report in the US? Under the tax treaty between the two countries, if I report it in Australia do I still have to report them in my US tax return? I’m very confused as to whether offset my US income vs. Oz losses to get my return in the US now or only report them in my Oz tax return and wait until in few years time I return to Australia? What happens if I sell a property in the meantime, do I need to pay the cpital gain tax here or in Australia or both? I do not want to pay tax twice and
I do not want to not paying enough tax under each country's law. I do really apprecciate if you could assist me in this complicated matter.

Regards,

__________________________________________________________________
david ingram replies:

You are one of seven Australian / Canada / USA questions that came in today and the only one being answered in our free forum.

As a US green card holder you are taxable on your world income. That means you must report:
* the interest on a trust account in the Bahamas
* the sale of stock held on the Isle of Mann
* A rental condo in Vancouver
* stock in Australia
* real estate rentals in Australia
* profits from a bus line in Finland (just did that)
* fees for services provided in Australia, South Africa, Germany, etc. over the Internet
* any other income you earned from investment or services or royalties or trailer fees from anyplace in the world.

You can read the US Australian Tax treaty at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-trty/aus.pdf

This will show you that you are also taxable in Australia first on rents (Art VI), dividends 15% (Art X), interest 10% (Art XI), Royalties 10% (Art XII), Business profits from a permanent establishment (Art VII), sale of real estate or real estate shares (Art XIII), Social Security Pensions (Art XVIII) and so on.

Capital Gains on publicly traded shares are not taxable in Australia when owned by non-residents.

And, if you are living in the US with a Green card, you are NOT taxable in Australia on your US wages, interest, dividends, etc Under Article IV of the Treaty.

Any tax you pay to Australia may be claimed on your US return by filling in US form 1116.

If you have a US green card and are just asking this question 'now', I 'know' your US returns are wrong. Your Australian are likely wrong as well because i will bet that you filed as a resident..

We would be happy to bring both the Australian and US returns up to date for you.
.