>
> QUESTION:
>
> I have an opportunity to work as an employee in the us for the next 7 to
> 10 years. I am 53. What is the impact on CPP and what can I expect form
> Social Security if I work for 1) 7 years or 2) 10 years. I have paid the
> max CPP since 1977 and expect to pay the max FICA.
> -------------------------------------------
>
> david ingram replies:
>
> You will receive approximtely 30/40th's of your CPP but it will not be
> based upon a lower earnings level than if you were still in Canada for
> the last ten years.
>
> However, if you do not work a full 10 years (40 quarters) you will not
> qualify for medical in retrirement if you do decide to stay in the US
> (i.e. get a green card). You can qualify at 7 years but have to pay a lot
> more. (less at 8 years, even less at 9 years and the least at ten years or
> more).
>
> You will receive 7 or 10/40th's of the max FICA
> (Social security) less a claw back for what is called the Windfall
> Elimination Provision. You can find out more about the WEP by reading
> these older questions
> ------------------------------------------------
> Thanks to Andrew for adding to this subject. - the original question and
> answer are at the bottom. david
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> David, any totalization request made to SSA to include CPP contributions
> will NOT affect one's CPP, which is fixed SOLELY on the basis of CPP
> contributions.
>
> One's SS will of course be smaller if totalization is used, than one who
> worked a full 40 quarters, and one's SS will be reduced marginally by
> one collecting CPP as well as SS (by Pension Windfall provisions of
> SS). But neither collecting SS, nor using totalization will in ANY WAY
> affect CPP payout.
>
> One will indeed collect from BOTH SS and CPP when totalization is used.
>
> Remember too that the poster will be eligible for a portion of his OAS
> as well.
>
> AGN
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centapede-admin at lists.centa.com
> [mailto:centapede-admin at lists.centa.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 16:15
> To: CENTAPEDE
> Subject: Returning to Canada early because of heart
> disease.
>
>
> QUESTION:
>
> I was born Dec 22/39 in Canada. I worked in Canada until Feb of 1997,
> moved to the US and presently work with a TN1 visa.
>
> I developed heart disease and have had two attacks since '01
>
> I would like to return to Canada and retire there near my family before
> it's too late.
>
> I understand I have to work in the US for 40 quarters to get their
> Social Security, I only have 27.
>
> I assume I cannot collect from both, but what is the result of applying
> the US/Canada treaty to my case?? Do I apply it to the Canadian or US
> fund and which one is more advantageous.
>
> =================================================
> david ingram replies:
>
> You will want to apply Canadian Earnings to the US Social Security to
> make up your time if they will allow it. With 27 quarters, they likely
> will and it will be to your advantage to get eh higher US money for two
> reasons.
>
> One it is a higher pension on a pro rata basis. Two - when received in
> Canada, only 85% is taxable.
>
> You will then receive a smaller CPP which will be more than made up by
> what you receive from the US Social Security.
>
> Your biggest problem is medical in the US. If you cannot see yourself
> continuing to work in the US, there is no sense but if you can get
> another 5 quarters in (up to 32) you can then buy your US social
> security medical and if you keep on working and putting in more
> quarters, you will get to the point where the full medical is free and
> you will have your 40 quarters. Remember, it is only 3 1/3 more years
> and you only need to earn $4,000 a year to qualify for four quarters a
> year.
>
> Perhaps, you could continue on a part-time basis for instance. I do
> notice that none of your company's three locations appear to be near the
> border but if you are filling a needed function, perhaps you could
> telecommute and live in Blaine, Washington, Pembina, North Dakota,
> Niagara Falls, or Calais, Maine (all US border towns), fill up your
> Social Security and be close enough to your Canadian Family to get the
> best of both.
> ------------ and other older questions
>
> My_question_is: Applicable to both US and Canada
> Subject: Pensions
> Expert: taxman at centa.com
> Date: Sunday January 14, 2007
> Time: 01:56 PM -0500
>
> QUESTION:
>
> Can an American Citizen ,living in Canada as a Permanent Resident married
> to
> a Canadian Citizen and having worked in the U.S. and Canada collect both
> Pensions as he paid into both pensions and lived and worked in the
> U.S.first for twenty years and another twenty years in Canada.Does he have
> to report the U.S. Pension in Canada and the Canadian in U.S. He has
> aU.S.passport for entry into the U.S. and a Permanent Resident Card for
> entry to Canada.
> --------------------------------------
> david ingram replies;
>
> Under Article XVIII(5) of the US / Canada Income Tax Convention, he or she
> is only taxable on the pensions in the country in which he or she lives.
>
> He or she does qualify for both pensions but only half of the CPP (20 out
> of
> 40 years) and less than half of Social Security because of a clawback
> provision called the Windfall Elimination Provision when he or she has not
> put a total of 30 years into US Social Security.
>
> You can find US Government explanations of the WEP at
>
> http://www.ssa.gov/retire2/wep.htm and
>
> http://www.socialsecurity.gov/retire2/wep-chart.htm and
>
> http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10045.html
>
>
> The following older Q & A might help -
>
> taxman at centa.com: Please see bottom of message if you wish to unsubscribe.
> ------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> My_question_is: Applicable to both US and Canada
> Subject: US Social Security
> Expert: taxman at centa.com
> Date: Wednesday December 13, 2006
> Time: 07:38 PM -0500
>
> QUESTION:
>
> I lived and worked in the US for 5 years, and recently returned to Canada.
> I
> have worked in Canada a total of 30 years.
>
> Do I qualify for any SSI compensation for the 5 years there or would I
> have
> needed to work the requisite 10 years to qualify for SSI pay?
>
> =============================================
> david ingram replies:
> When you hit retirement age, you will fill in an application for US Social
> Security and an application for Canada Pension Plan.
>
> In general, The US will give you credit for five years of contributing to
> Canada Pension Plan to make up the ten years qualifying period.
>
> Then, because you have not contributed for 30 years, they (the Social
> Security Administration) will apply the Windfall Elimination Provision and
> send you about half of the actual Social Security benefits you earned.
>
> This is NOT discrimination against Canadian or other country workers
> however. The WEP also applies to US people who have worked in different
> occupations in different states. For instance teachers in some states do
> not contribute to Social Security. If they move to a different state where
> they do, the WEP reduces their Social Security in the US because of the
> "Windfall" of the other states pension. So it is not just used against
> Canadians.
>
> The following older answers may help as well as they contain comments from
> other readers.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This was an older centapede that dealt with two other opinions about the
> Windfall Elimination provision
>
> david
>
>
> Social Security - Foreign Work test -
>
>
> Frank C sends more information about this very important matter for those
> who have contributed to Social Security and to CPP as well. Read on and
> save
> if it applies or might apply to you in the future.
>
>
> ==========================================
> David,
>
> One further correction. The Windfall Elimination Act does not affect
> someone receiving OAS from Canada, only CPP. The U.S. legislation refers
> to
> pensions derived from working. (Unlike Canada, the U.S. offers no pension
> to people just because they have reached a certain age. They must have
> worked, or their spouses must have worked.) So, if you WORK in Canada,
> and
> have worked less than 30 years in the U.S., the WEA will affect you.
>
> And...if you take Social Security early (before the standard retirement
> age
> for the year you were born) and work in Canada, you'll be hit with yet
> another rule: the "Foreign Work Test". This rule takes away one month of
> SS
> benefits for each 45-hours you work in Canada in a month! This
> effectively
> means that you can't be receiving early SS in Canada (say, at 62) and
> working in Canada, unless your wages are so high that you don't mind
> forfeiting your SS. Once you reach full retirement age, though, you can
> work in Canada as much as you like. Here's a good article on this
> subject:
>
> http://overseasdigest.com/odsamples/foreigntest.html
>
> Interestingly, I was born in the same year as Mark (below) and also plan
> to
> use my university years in Canada to qualify for full OAS. Sure hope that
> time is considered as "living" in Canada! (How could it not??)
>
> Frank C
>
>
>
>>
>>I obviously did not understand the 30 year rule or substantial payments to
>>FICA to avoid a Clawback when receiving OAS / CPP from Canada . My
>>understanding was that the US / Canada Social Security Totalization rules
>>overrode the WEP but it appears I may have been incorrect. Read on if you
>>are going to be collecting both with les than 30 years into the FICA (US
>>Federal Insurance Contribution Act or Social Security), I have no time to
>>study or figure it out at the moment so will leave it to others. I have
>>received several different replies:
>>
>>Andrew Nelson sent the first correction:
>>
>>I guess you are not aware of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)
>>that hits many cross-border workers.
>>
>>THAT is what this person is complaining about. It really does sock
>>anyone who earns foreign pension (including CPP) but has less than 30
>>years (not 10) of SS-contributions.
>>
>>As the writer states, it does result in a substantial knock down of SS,
>>unless the person can manage to reach the 30 year mark.
>>
>>This is the SSA's equivalent of the IRS's AMT provisions, and can hurt
>>pretty bad.
>>
>>There is a couple of pros out there (namely Keats) who have been
>>successful in getting the SSA to use the totalization treaty to override
>>WEP, but it is not simple.
>>
>>Keats has a chapter on it in his latest Border Guide. Only his latest
>>version, since WEP is just now hitting retirees.
>>
>>AGN
>>
>>=====================
>>
>>Mark sends the second addition
>>
>>
>>Warning: the following is wordy but I've included some details that might
>>be
>>useful in your practice. I also have a new question at the end. Hope I'm
>>not
>>stretching my luck...
>>
>>Thank you for such a rapid response and for forwarding all those dialogues
>>with
>>others that pertained to my situation. I was prepared to wait several
>>months,
>>knowing you have quite a backlog.
>>
>>I very much like your suggestions about H&R Block and Jim Pettinger. I'm
>>on
>>his mailing list and have often thought about attending one of his
>>seminars,
>>but haven't as I'm not much interested in export-import. I will
>>definitely
>>give him a shout. I've also wondered about the Victoria Clipper (Seattle
>>company) that docks here in Victoria a block from where I live. I just
>>missed
>>an accounting job advertised by a Canadian mining company literally metres
>>south of the border in Blaine. They have gold mines in both countries.
>>I'm
>>hoping their newly hired accountant leaves soon;) Seems to me I'd be a
>>perfect
>>fit for them to visit their mines in Alaska and B.C. & Quebec.
>>
>>As to the US/Canada Social Security Agreement, my understanding is that
>>would
>>apply if I were working in Canada on a short-term basis, but I've been
>>resident
>>in Canada nearly 5 years, so I've contributed to CPP for a few years now.
>>As
>>you know, it takes nearly that long to complete the citizenship path,
>>which
>>I've just done a couple weeks ago. I did pay a personal visit to Social
>>Security in Bellingham a couple years ago to learn more about the Windfall
>>Elimination Provision, and I did find out they would never deduct more
>>than
>>50%
>>of my CPP from Social Security. Such generosity. I have 25 years worked
>>in
>>the US (I'm 57 y.o.) but with 30 I would escape the WEP penalty
>>altogether.
>>I
>>spoke with the manager of the SocSec office in B'ham so he knew my
>>situation
>>and he never said the totalization agreement would apply.
>>
>> See WEP info: http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10045.html
>>
>> FYI, WEP was instituted in 1983 during the Reagan presidency as
>> part of a package to save Social Security. For someone like me,
>> contributing to another country's system, it's just a tax grab
>> ripoff, in my humble opinion. I liken it to paying premiums on
>> two life insurance policies and then having the beneficiary find
>> out upon my demise that the 1st company won't pay because there
>> had been a second policy. Never mind I'd paid premiums for both.
>>
>>I'm aware of the relative withholding rates for FICA vs. CPP, and I would
>>only
>>work for someone else in the US to avoid the self-employment rate. I
>>figure
>>
>>for the five years I'd work in US, it would work to my benefit to pay the
>>higher FICA rate as I would increase my retirement income about $200/mo.
>>between earning more SocSec and avoiding the WEP. I intend to live in
>>Canada
>>in retirement in spite of higher taxation because my partner is Canadian
>>(only)
>>and detests the U.S.
>>
>>I won't be subject to the OAS clawback in retirement, sorry to say, though
>>I
>>should approach the $60K annual income limit. Jointly, our goal is to
>>have
>>about $60K income EACH so we avoid the clawback. By the way, I currently
>>am
>>self-employed in Victoria as a small-time (friends & family) financial
>>advisor.
>>
>>The current net income limits for OAS clawback, from 0-100%, are $60,806-
>>$98,850. (You had used a figure of $80,000+ for the upper limit in your
>>reply.)
>>
>>
>>ANOTHER SEPARATE (BUT RELATED) QUESTION
>>
>>I wasn't going to send this to you until I heard back on the first one,
>>but
>>we're already there!
>>
>>I fall into Category 2 below (between the dotted lines) for a full OAS
>>pension.
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Full Pension
>>
>>Normally, if you meet the conditions in either of the two categories
>>below, you qualify for a full pension:
>>
>>Category 1 - You meet the one condition below
>>
>> You lived in Canada for at least 40 years after turning 18. NO
>>
>>Category 2 - You meet the three conditions below
>>
>> 1. You were born on or before July 1, 1952. YES
>> 2. Between the time you turned 18 and July 1, 1977, you
>> lived in Canada for some period of time. ???
>> 3. You lived in Canada for the 10 years immediately before
>> your application was approved. YES
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>#1) I was born in 1948.
>>#3) I will have been resident in Canada 12 full years when I turn 65.
>>
>>The gray area for me is condition #2, as I was a student at U. of Alberta
>>in
>>1976. There is some question, even among the local OAS office personnel,
>>whether that qualifies as 'living' in Canada. My own opinion is that I
>>did
>>not 'live' anywhere else during that time. I cannot find any definition
>>of 'living' or 'residence' in the OAS Act or in OAS appeal cases.
>>
>>So, at long last, my question for you:
>>
>>DO YOU KNOW OF ANY LAWYERS THAT WOULD HAVE EXPERTISE IN OAS ELIGIBILITY
>>APPEALS?
>>
>>The difference between a partial (12/40=30%) and full OAS pension for me
>>is
>>just over $4,000/yr., not an insignificant amount in my retirement
>>planning.
>>I'd like to know what my chances are of qualifying for the full pension.
>>
>>Thanks again for all your help and super-rapid response.
>>-----------------------------
>>david ingram replies:
>>
>>I do not know of anyone that specializes in OAS appeals. Does anyone
>>else?
>>
>>
>>The original Q & A follows:
>>
>>###########################################################################
>>Q
>> > Subject: Employment opportunities for US-Canadian dual citizen
>> > Expert: taxman at centa.com
>> > Date: Tuesday November 08, 2005
>> > Time: 10:52 PM -0800
>> >
>> > QUESTION:
>> >
>> > I am US-born and recently became a Canadian citizen also. I want to
>>live
>>in
>> > White Rock, or vicinity (to preserve my Canadian Old Age Security
>> > eligibility), and commute daily to work along the I-5 corridor between
>> > Blaine and Bellingham.
>> >
>> > I am caught in the trap of the US Social Security 'Windfall Elimination
>> > Provision' which will deduct the exchange-related equivalent of 1/2 of
>>my
>> > Canada Pension Plan benefit from my US Social Security benefit unless I
>>earn
>> > another five years of 'substantial earnings' in the US.
>> >
>> > Are you aware of any employment agencies on either side of the
>>BC/Washington
>> > border that recruit dual citizens in particular? I read in one of your
>> > email replies that dual truck drivers are in great demand, but having
>>spent
>> > most of my career as an accountant, that's probably not a fit for me.
>>Any
>> > ideas are much appreciated.
>> > --------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > david ingram replies:
>> >
>> > I do not know of agencies that specifically deal with dual citizens.
>>Maybe
>> > "we" should start one up. If you are an accountant, take the H & R
>> > Block
>>tax
>> > course in Bellingham and the one in Vancouver and get into dual country
>>tax
>> > work. I am always looking for someone who is good at that.
>> >
>> > Look for a company that works on both sides of the border.
>> >
>> > Calling Jim Pettinger at 604 273-4474 might give you some ideas. Jim
>>runs
>> > International Market Access with warehouses in Bellingham and Richmond
>>and
>> > runs regular seminars on cross border issues.
>> >
>> > I would bet that he has over 100 clients who might be able to use the
>> > services of someone who can work on both sides of the border with no
>> > restrictions.
>> >
>> > With regard to the US / Canada Social Security Agreement, i do not
>> > understand your concern. What the agreement is set up to deal with is
>> > making sure that you only get one or the other of a pension for the
>> > same
>> > time worked.
>> >
>> > In general, if you can put into the US system, you will receive
>>materially
>> > more when you apply for your CPP or FICA.
>> >
>> > If you work as an employee in the USA, you will have to contribute your
>>half
>> > to the FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) at roughly 6.23% up
>> > to
>>a
>> > maximum of ($87,900 -400) $87500 for a total of $5449.80.
>> >
>> > At the same time you will be paying another 1.45% of the income with no
>> > limits so at $100,000 you would pay $1,450 and at $200,000 you would
>> > pay
>> > $2,900 but would still only owe the $5450.00 of Social Security (FICA).
>> >
>> > If you were self employed, you would pay both halves.
>> >
>> > Compare this with the CPP which charges employees 4.45% on a maximum of
>> > ($40,500 - $3.500) $37,000 or $1,831.50 and that is it. (all figures
>>were
>> > 2004 calculations by the way).
>> >
>> > As for the Old AGE Pension that Canada hands out, remember that it now
>>has
>> > an earnings test and is all clawed back by $80,000+ earnings.
>> >
>> > The best situation for an over 65 person is to have worked the last ten
>> > years in the US to qualify for the US social Security and Medicare A &
>>B.
>> > Live in Washington state and you have medical as good as BC's and a
>> > much
>> > lower tax rate on your pension income.
>> >
>> > I am 99% sure that you will end up with more money that way then living
>>in
>> > Canada and trying to collect OAS
> ---------------------------------------
> David Ingram's US / Canada Services
> US / Canada / Mexico tax, Immigration and working Visa Specialists
> US / Canada Real Estate Specialists
> My Home office is at:
> 4466 Prospect Road
> North Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7N 3L7
> Cell (604) 657-8451 -
> (604) 980-0321 Fax (604) 980-0325
>
> Calls welcomed from 10 AM to 10 PM 7 days a week Vancouver (LA) time -
> (please do not fax or phone outside of those hours as this is a home
> office)
>
> email to taxman at centa.com <mailto:taxman at centa.com>
> www.centa.com <http://www.centa.com/> www.david-ingram.com
> <http://www.david-ingram.com/>
>
> Disclaimer: This question has been answered without detailed information
> or
> consultation and is to be regarded only as general comment. Nothing in
> this message is or should be construed as advice in any particular
> circumstances. No contract exists between the reader and the author and
> any
> and all non-contractual duties are expressly denied. All readers should
> obtain formal advice from a competent and appropriately qualified legal
> practitioner or tax specialist for expert help, assistance, preparation,
> or
> consultation in connection with personal or business affairs such as at
> www.centa.com <http://www.centa.com> . If you forward this message, this
> disclaimer must be included."
>
>
> Be ALERT, the world needs more "lerts"
>
>
> David Ingram gives expert income tax & immigration help to non-resident
> Americans & Canadians from New York to California to Saudi Arabia to
> Mexico
> to China or Chile - family & estate trust trusts Cross border, dual
> citizen - out of country investments are all handled with competence &
> authority.
>
> Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
> California, Colorado, Connecticut,
> Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida,
> Garland, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois,
> Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky,
> Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
> Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
> Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska,
> Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
> New Mexico, New York, North Carolina,
> North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon.
> Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Rockwall,
> South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,
> Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia,
> West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming,
> British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,
> Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec City,
> New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island,
> Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Yukon and
> Northwest and Nunavit Territories,
> Mount Vernon, Eumenclaw, Coos Bay
> and Dallas Houston Rockwall Garland
> Texas Taxman and Tax Guru and wizzard
> wizard - consultant - expert - advisor -advisors consultants - gurus -
> Paris
> Prague Moscow Berlin
> Lima Rio de Janeiro, Santaigo Zimbabwe
>
>
> David Ingram expert income tax help and preparation of US Canada Mexico
> non-resident and cross border returns with rental dividend wages
> self-employed and royalty foreign tax credits family estate trust trusts
> New York, Boston, Sacramento, Minneapolis, Salem, Wheeling, Philadelphia,
> Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Pensacola, Miami, St Petersburg, Naples, Fort Myers,
> Cape Coral, Orlando, Atlanta, Arlington, Washington, Hudson, Green Bay,
> Minot, Portland, Seattle, St John, St John's, Fredericton, Quebec,
> Moncton,
> Truro, Atlanta, Charleston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego,
> Sacramento, Taos, Grand Canyon, Reno, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Sun City, Tulsa,
> Monteray, Carmel, Morgantown, Bemidji, Sandpointe, Pocatello, Bellingham,
> Custer, Grand Forks, Lead, Rapid City, Mitchell, Kansas City, Lawrence,
> Houston, Albany, Framingham, Cambridge, London, Paris, Prince George,
> Prince
> Rupert, Whitehorse, Anchorage, Fairbanks, Frankfurt, The Hague, Lisbon,
> Madrid, Atlanta, Myrtle Beach, Key West, Cape Coral, Fort Meyers,
> Berlin,
> Hamburg
> Warsaw, Auckland, Wellington, Honolulu, Maui, Kuwait, Molokai, Beijing,
> Shanghai, Tokyo, Manilla, Kent, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Regina, Red Deer,
> Olds,
> Medicine Hat, Lethbridge, Moose Jaw, Brandon, Portage La Prairie,
> Davidson,
> Craik, Edmonton, Calgary, Victoria, Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey, Edinburgh,
> Dublin, Belfast, Glasgow, Copenhagen, Oslo, Munich, Sydney, Nanaimo,
> Brisbane, Melbourne, Darwin, Perth, Athens, Rome, Berne, Zurich, Kyoto,
> Nanking, Rio De Janeiro, Brasilia, Colombo, Buenos Aries, Squamish,
> Churchill, Lima, Santiago, Abbotsford, Cologne, Yorkshire, Hope,
> Penticton,
> Kelowna, Vernon, Fort MacLeod, Deer Lodge, Springfield, St Louis,
> Centralia,
> Bradford, Stratford on Avon, Niagara Falls, Atlin, Fort Nelson, Fort St
> James, Red Deer, Drumheller, Fortune, Red Bank, Marystown, Cape Spears,
> Truro, Charlottetown, Summerside, Niagara Falls, Albany Zimbabwe
>
> international non-resident cross border income tax help estate family
> trust assistance expert preparation & immigration consultant david ingram,
> experts on rentals mutual funds RRSP RESP IRA 401(K) & divorce preparer
> preparers
> consultants
>
>
> This from "ask an income tax and immigration expert" from www.centa.com
> <http://www.centa.com/> or www.jurock.com <http://www.jurock.com/> or
> www.featureweb.com <http://www.featureweb.com/> . David Ingram deals on a
> daily basis with expatriate tax returns with:
> multi jurisdictional cross and trans border expatriate problems for the
> United States, Canada, Mexico, Great Britain, United Kingdom, Kuwait,
> Dubai,
> Saudi Arabia, Thailand, Indonesia, Japan, China, New Zealand, France,
> Germany, Spain, Italy, Russia, Georgia, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia,
> Scotland, Ireland, Hawaii, Florida, Montana, Morocco, Israel, Iraq, Iran,
> India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Mali, Bangkok, Greenland, Iceland, Cuba,
> Bahamas, Bermuda, Barbados, St Vincent, Grenada,, Virgin Islands, US, UK,
> GB, and any of the 43 states with state tax returns, etc. Rockwall,
> Dallas,
> San Antonio Houston
> Denmark, Finland, Sweden Norway Bulgaria Croatia Income Tax and
> Immigration
> Tips, Income Tax Immigration Wizard Antarctica Rwanda Guru Consultant
> Specialist Section 216(4) 216(1) NR6 NR-6 NR 6 Non-Resident Real Estate
> tax
> specialist expert preparer expatriate anti money laundering money
> seasoning
> FINTRAC E677 E667 105 106 TDF-90 Reporting $10,000 cross border
> transactions
> Grand Cayman Aruba Zimbabwe South Africa Namibia help USA US
>
>
>
What's Related