Immigration to the USA - getting a green card -
Subject: Immigration Expert: taxman at centa.com Date: Monday September 13, 2004 Time: 05:12 PM -0700 QUESTION: Sir, I have an employment authorization (work permit)visa good for 5 years here in USA. This is my 3rd year. I am a Canadian citizen, I wonder if you could kindly give me an advise. I want to get a permanent residency here in USA together with my family, why can't the company sponsor me? I was told that this is a Department of Labor issue and not an Immigration. I was told by our company lawyer that my job title (job description, duties, etc) can be done by American and cannot be given to me. On the first place WHY did they sponsor me as a tranferee from Canada to USA? Now they are turning back and saying "NO, we can't help you" kind of. I researched at the USCIS website and the criterias asked, I already met. Kindly advise. JXXXXX ========================================= david ingram replies: My thinking is that they have decided that they do not want to keep you on as an employee. If they do not sponsor you for your resident alien (green) card, you are out of there" in another two years without a golden handshake, etc., Otherwise, I know of no reason why they can not try and keep you by getting your resident alien card for you and your family. Unfortunately, unlike Canada where having worked in the country for a year goes a LOOONG way towards getting you a permanent resident (PR) status, the US requires you to have a sponsor which is usually your employer in these cases. You could just "get in line" for immigration but I think it is about a 14 year waiting list and in the meantime, you would have to come back to Canada. If you are on an H1-B, you might consider looking for another job in the USA The new rules make it an 80 to 90% likelihood that you can move your H1-B and maybe you can make a deal for the new company to sponsor you. You should likely consult a local US immigration attorney. Remember, the company lawyer is working for the company, NOT you. This leads me to the fact that: I "used" to have a number of large corporations as clients in these matters. I have none left because I always thought my duty was to explain the facts of life to the person wanting to go and work in the US. The recruiters were always promising the moon with the wife and kids getting the right to work in a couple of years . I would explain that it would likely take five or six years or never and that the wife could not volunteer, the 17 year old son or daughter could not get a job at the Dairy Queen or MacDonald's and that this situation tended to develop a poisonous family atmosphere. By the time I was finished, half of the recruited had changed their minds. On the other hand, I still think it is better to send someone south whose family is "truly" prepared for the limitations which they will live under. Husbands tend to start resenting their kids and wife who are totally dependent on hubby for every single stinking red cent and of course, the spouse and children start feeling like the second class non-citizens that they have become. Linda Deck's "Susan's Story" follows embedded in my November 1998 newsletter. www.centa.com Please note that the amounts, exchange rates, etc are those found in November, 1998 November 1998. Also note that I was explicitly talking about TN visas here. the same rules are pretty applicable to those with H1 visas and used to apply to all L1 visas. The spouse (but not the children) of most L1 transferees can now work as of January 2003 (or was it Jan 2002 - oh well, you get the idea. david ingram's CEN-TAPEDE US / Canadian Income Tax, Immigration and General Information Newsletter - Nov 12, 1998 GETTING A JOB IN THE U.S.A. - TREATY NAFTA The Oct 98 CEN-TAPEDE newsletter dealt with individuals working in the U.S.A. with a TN (Treaty Nafta) visa. I put out a warning suggesting that individuals with this visa should be careful about leaving the U.S. for a while because there seems to be a renewed vigour by U.S. INS agents to re- invent the wheel. We (and others) were being told that individuals were having their TN visas taken away from them because the INS officials were "re-qualifying" people at the border. I will try and explain. To get a TN visa, one must be: 1. a member of 63 different professional occupations accepting a job as an employee 2. willing to accept a "temporary" job with a contract for less than one year. However, even though the job is temporary, you can usually / likely renew it for eight years or maybe even more. Remember, the entry to the U.S. is supposed to be "temporary" in nature and the applicant is specifically "honour bound" to be entering the U.S. without the intention of staying in the United States permanently. I ask you, just "how" does a "temporary" worker explain why he or she has sold their $300,000 house and car in Canada, given up all Canadian clubs, unions, bank accounts, health cards, and magazine subscriptions, sold their summer or ski cabin, and bought a $300,000 house in the United States if the job is "temporary". What happened was this: The United States employer hired the Canadian for a long term. You will agree with me that "George" is not going to do everything I just mentioned for a one year job. However, the American employer told the Canadian that to get across the border, the company can only give them a one year (less a day) contract for border crossing purposes. The Canadian demanded (and got) an actual contract for 5 years with provisions for moving expenses, car, travel allowance, etc. After all, who is going to sell their house, move to another country (or province) and buy another house without some job security. The Canadian has his or her "real" contract in their attaché case when they cross the border or they just innocently tell the INS officer (when asked) that they are intending to stay for five years, or that they have applied for permanent status, or, or, or. Sometimes, if things seem to be going awry, the Canadian panics and starts demanding his rights (of which there are none or at least very few) because his wife and family are in Las Vegas and he has to get home or as happens most often in my experience, the dependent spouse and children with the TD (treaty dependent) visas puts their foot in it because they are trying to get home after a visit to Canada. Let me be very clear here. One wrong word or sentence at the U.S. border can have your TN visa revoked and your having to hire someone else to go south and clean out your house because that INS officer at the border has banned you for five or ten years for lying to them. Yes, that INS officer does have the power to ban you with no official avenue of appeal. I will give you another example that I have seen 20 or 25 times: A Computer Systems Analyst qualifies to go to the United States under NAFTA. A computer Programmer does NOT qualify. After 25 years in the computer business, I still find the difference hard to figure out. As a consequence, there are a lot of Programmers going across the border with letters offering them jobs as Systems Analysts. However, when spouse and children are flying home to Las Vegas after a Xmas holiday in Vancouver (with their TN visas) and the INS officer asks the 15 year old daughter what her father does and she says dad is a computer PROGRAMMER, the axe falls. In this case, if dad "is" a programmer and was "hired as a programmer", both dad and the company who issued the systems analyst letter are guilty of immigration fraud. Dad is likely banned from the U.S. for 5 years, and, of course the whole family gets to stay in Canada. SPOUSE AND KIDS CANNOT WORK The Spouse and children of TN, L1, H1B, H2A, H2B, J1, M1, O1, P1, or even B1 (as I wrote this on Nov 13, 98, a Swedish B1 visa holder who had been in the U.S. for 5 months wanted to know if his wife could work) visa holders may not work at any salaried occupation in the United States. If they volunteer, they can not volunteer for something that other individuals are being paid for in the same organization. The spouse of an H1A visa holder (usually a nurse or a physiotherapist) can work though. It is interesting that H1A"s are usually held by women and their male husbands "do" get to work but all the other visas are usually held by men and their female wives do not get to work. Of course, a "male" nurse"s wife could work in this situation. This is devastating to the family in many circumstances and for 35 years I have seen marriages break up and despondent kids where dad is working in the states and no one else can work. My favourite (in a sad sort of way) situation involved the wife of a Canadian Pacific Airlines pilot who was based in Honolulu and flying the Australia - Hawaii route. After about 18 months, she left him and came back to Vancouver. To this day, 20+ years later, "studly" pilot still does not understand why his wife was not happy to just lie on the beach and work on her sun tan. "You" try this for instance: "You" are offered a job in San Francisco or Milwaukee and move there with your spouse and three kids aged 12, 13, and 15. Your spouse gives up a $50,000 job as a non-degreed accountant at a local hospital. (In other words, without an accounting degree, your spouse does not qualify to work in the U.S.). At first, it is exciting. Your wife is setting up house and you have a new job / territory to explore. But after six months, she gets restless and your 15 year old is also wanting some spending money. After all, his friends are all selling burgers at MacDonalds, taking credit cards at the corner gas station, or bussing tables at DENNY's. However, "your" wife cannot work, "your" children cannot work, and you are in trouble. If you have an L1, you can simply have your company apply for a green (resident alien) card for you and depending on whether you are in Pocatello, Idaho, or San Francisco, or Atlanta, Georgia, you might be lucky and get a permanent card in two or three years and your spouse and kids can act like they actually "live" in the U.S. If you have a TN, there is a real problem. If you apply for a resident alien card, you might not qualify for a TN any more. In other words, applying for a green card and then going home to Winnipeg for Xmas could result in your not getting back into the U.S. after your Xmas vacation. I say that you and all members of your family should never cross the border again until you have a green card if you are working in the U.S. with a TN and have applied for permanent status. By never crossing the border, you do not have to answer any questions about your status. Just make sure that you get your TN and TD visas renewed by mail on time. FAMILY DYNAMICS And let me make my point. If making enough money and not plagued with single income financial hassles, the working visa holder is usually happy. He or she has their job and position and money and accolades. Everyone else is a third class person living on allowances doled out by the sole working person. It is a situation looking for disaster. Rather than use one of my own clients to explain some other consequences, I am going to use "SUSAN'S STORY" which I have extracted from an excellent book entitled: NAFTA Trade Dependency: The Ramifications, Solutions and Guidebook for NAFTA Family Members - $24.95 US this book and another book entitled: Job Mobility Across the 49th: the FAQs $12.95 US are available from author Linda P Deck at: www.pagemastersinc.com (BARGAIN - buy both for only $28.90 U.S.) or if you cannot order on the INTERNET, you can order at (800) 986-2314. If you are looking for a Xmas gift for your TD (Trade Dependent) daughter who is living with her husband in Las Vegas, or Atlanta, or Los Angeles or you are thinking of getting one of these visas yourself, then these books are what you want. Get both. The first explains the problems and the second gives the FAQs (frequently asked questions) answers. Any Canadian employer thinking of transferring a married person south (or North to Alaska) should make sure the employee"s spouse has read and initialed each and every page BEFORE actually transferring the employee. Every U.S. employer who is thinking of hiring a married Canadian under the TN visa process should make sure that the prospective employee's spouse has read and initialed each and every page BEFORE actually signing up the employee. It is far too expensive to hire and train someone who you expect to work for 6 or 7 years only to have them leave in 6 months. Although the comments here apply to the spouse and children of most (except H1A and G1A) visa holders, the worst affected are the TN / TD combinations. The reason is very simple. If you are offered one of the easy 63 jobs this afternoon by fax and you have all your original degrees in place, I can have you working legally in Chicago or Los Angeles or Atlanta or New York tomorrow morning. Your spouse will not even know what happened. It is that easy. And because it is so easy, there is no time for the spouse to really analyze what she is getting into. The story I am reprinting here is from Page 14 of: Linda Deck"s book "NAFTA TRADE DEPENDENCY:" SUSAN'S STORY Susan waited in the women's shelter reception area, hoping against hope that she would be welcomed and given a place to stay for the time being. Beside her sat two of her children, a ten-year old daughter, Michelle, and a fourteen year old son, Matthew. Would there be room at the shelter tonight for the three of them? Would the shelter turn a blind eye to them, as the three of them are NOT citizens or permanent residents? Worst of all, what about her eldest, fifteen year old Jonathon, who refused to come with them and was still home with his father? Susan came to the Women's Shelter today, even though the hot line worker smugly informed her that basically her only choice is to leave the kids behind and flee the country. The shelter could only offer very temporary assistance. Yet it was better than the first phone call Susan had made. The other crisis line worker was so uncomfortable with the concept of a temporary resident needing help from the community that the worker started giggling like a school girl. The movie, "Not Without My Daughter" took on a whole new meaning for Susan. If Susan had guessed for a minute two years ago that she would be playing the leading role in her own personal saga of "Not Without My Three Kids", she would never have opted to accompany her husband in his quest for adventure and different employment in the United States. For the past year, Susan coped with progressively worsening marital conditions in the household. Her husband, Frank, became increasingly demanding and showed increased stress in his daily life. Finally on Friday night, the whole situation climaxed. Susan managed to escape with the two younger children to seek medical attention at the hospital. It started simply enough. The family had decided to relocate for Frank's job and that it would be all right for Susan not to work for a time. Susan had welcomed the opportunity "not to work" full time and to study. She did not realize the impact of being forcibly unemployed, completely vulnerable and on only one income which was not hers. They made the move from Canada to the United States. For the first time in her adult life, Susan suddenly had zero personal income. Gradually, Susan became aware of the problems associated with being dependent upon another person for the very roof over her head, the food in the panty and the clothes in her and the children's closets. Being an independent woman, this was so very different from anything she had ever experienced before. The finances worsened, leaving Frank and Susan's family wondering if they could afford to make all the monthly payments and save themselves from bankruptcy. Even though they pinched pennies, it was still not quite enough to save them from diminishing their savings account. Susan was forced to quit her university studies, as they could not afford the foreign student tuition bill after the second semester on Frank's single salary. Now that the financial stress had resulted in physical abuse and Susan was awaiting help from society, the news she is about to discover is not going to make her day. She will find out that she may remain in the shelter temporarily with her daughter Michelle. Her son, Matthew will either have to go home to his father or to a runaway shelter for boys. Her son, Jonathon, will stay with his father, Frank. Susan's legal dependent status has just become void, as she is no longer with her bread- winning husband, Frank. She does not qualify for any social assistance in either Canada or the United States. Susan appears not to have any choice but to return home to Canada with only two of her children, fracturing the family unit and smuggling her children out of the United States. Even though she wants to obey the law and wait for a court date to apply for custody and permission to take the children out of the country, her status has become void. She has no means of supporting herself to wait for legal custody. As a typical mother, leaving any of her children behind with an international border between them is not an option. To return home to Canada, she will be forced to make the trip look like a short and happy vacation. If the airlines or the border patrol suspect that she is taking the children out of the country without her abusive husband's permission, they have the right (and duty) to deny her entry onto the airplane or into the country (CANADA). Ironically, she is supposed to have notarized permission from her husband to flee the country (United States) with the children. Adding to the stress, she realizes that she does not even have enough money for transportation home. She will have no choice but to leave the family house and every material item she has ever worked for behind as she accepts donations from her family or the (Canadian) Embassy for bus, air or train fare. There is no possibility for the family to work out their differences with a trail separation (within the community). Once Susan escapes the abuse, she is stripped of even her legal status (i.e. her U.S. TD visa is subservient to her husband's TN visa and does not stand alone.). The domestic abuse shelters vary according to the length of time that Susan may stay. Some shelters are merely on a daily basis where she would be forced to leave the shelter at 6 AM. Other shelters would allow her to stay for between fourteen to thirty days. After that, she would be on her own in a foreign country and without legal work authorization. She may not simply transfer from one shelter to another one. The shelters communicate with one another. The result would be that Susan would become banned from all the shelters in town. Susan accidentally discovered the suffering that many immigrant women worldwide suffer as soon as they become immigrants or non-immigrants. This is not a new phenomenon. However this particular situation is happening under the guise of free trade. The governments promoted the NAFTA as being an alternative to waiting for permanent residency or landed immigrant status. Susan and many others might have known some of the challenges they were about to face if the decision had been to relocate to a Third World overseas country (even Saudi Arabia for instance) where females and their children enjoy few human rights. Susan and her family merely relocated within North America and had no idea that the hurdles involved would be similar to moving overseas. If they had realized the similarities of the challenges, they simply would not have moved. Remember, the CEN-TA Group provides Long Distance, Fax, FEDEX and mail tax work and consulting. Our clients are in 100 countries at any one time. One of four offices, our North Vancouver office has specialized in US / CANADIAN corporate and personal Income Tax Preparation and Consulting since 1969. Remember, one more thing. $100,000 U.S. may be worth $152,000 Canadian but ONLY if you are living in Canada. If you are living in San Francisco, $100,000 U.S. will likely not buy any more than: * $110,000 CDN would buy in Vancouver, * $85,000 CDN would buy in Calgary, and * $75,000 CDN would buy in Regina. (this includes housing, food, heat, light, car operation, 28% fed tax, 7% sales tax, 10% state tax, and the 15.6% U.S. Social Security Tax. Answers to this and other similar questions can be obtained free on Air every Sunday morning. Every Sunday at 9:00 AM on 600AM in Vancouver, Fred Snyder of Cartier Partners and I will be hosting an INFOMERCIAL but LIVE talk show called "ITS YOUR MONEY" Those outside of the Lower Mainland will be able to listen on the internet at www.600AM.com Local phone calls to (604) 280-0600 - Long distance calls to 1-866-778-0600. Old shows are archived at the site. This from ask an income tax immigration planning and bankruptcy expert consultant guru or preparer from www.centa.com or www.jurock.com or www.featureweb.com. Canadian David Ingram deals daily with tax returns dealing with expatriate: multi jurisdictional cross and trans border expatriate gambling refunds for the United States, Canada Mexico Great Britain the United Kingdom, Kuwait, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand, Indonesia, Egypt, Antarctica, Japan, China, New Zealand, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Russia, Georgia, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Scotland, Ireland, Hawaii, Florida, Montana, Morocco, Israel, Iraq, Iran, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Mali, Bangkok, Greenland, Iceland, Cuba, Bahamas, Bermuda, Barbados, St Vincent, Grenada,, Virgin Islands, US, UK, GB, American and Canadian and Mexican and any of the 43 states with state tax returns, etc. income tax wizard wizzard guru advisor advisors experts specialist specialists consultants taxmen taxman tax woman planner planning preparer of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California Denver Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware District of Columbia Miami Florida, Garland Georgia, Honolulu Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana Des Moines Iowa Kansas Kentucky, Louisiana Bangor Maine Maryland Boston, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico,New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon. Paris, Rome, Sydney, Australia Hilton Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Rockwall, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec City, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Yukon and Northwest and Nunavit Territories, Mount Vernon, Eumenclaw, Coos Bay and Dallas Houston Rockwall Garland Texas Taxman and Tax Guru and wizzard wizard - David Ingram's US/Canada Services US/Canada/Mexico Tax Immigration & working Visa Specialists US / Canada Real Estate Specialists 4466 Prospect Road (Personal residence by appointment only please) North Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7N 3L7 Calls accepted from 10 AM to 10 PM 7 days a week Res (604) 980-3578 Cell (604) 657-8451 Bus (604) 980-0321 Fax (604) 980- 0325 davidingram at shaw.ca www.david-ingram.com Disclaimer: This question has been answered without detailed information or consultation and is to be regarded only as general comment. Nothing in this message is or should be construed as advice in any particular circumstances. No contract exists between the reader & the author and any and all non-contractual duties are expressly denied. All readers should obtain formal advice from a competent financial, or real estate planner or advisor & appropriately qualified legal practitioner, tax or immigration specialist in connection with personal or business affairs such as at www.centa.com. This is a bad joke but sort of makes a point. The Maine Man Some friends were on vacation in Maine, and while watching fireworks heard their small son say, "Oh, God!" The father quickly cautioned his son, "Please don't speak the Lord's name in vain." The boy nodded but obviously mis-heard, because he asked quietly, "Is it OK if I speak his name back in Minnesota?" ======================================= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.centa.com/CEN-TAPEDE/centapede/attachments/20040913/968027b1/attachment.htm
What's Related