This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Dear,
My case is little tricky and I need your input please. Couple of guys =
used=20
my address to file tax returns and everybody including me got tax review =
letters from revenue Canada. All of us replied and now they refered our=20
cases to Ottawa internaional tax center. My situation is that I am =
working=20
in states for the last three years and filing return in both US and =
Canada=20
but because I lived in States in first two years, thats why I did not=20
declare that income in my Canadian tax returns. I filed Canadian tax =
returns=20
for Candian income for those both years (2000 and 2001). My family was=20
continuously living in Canada for those two years. Then I moved back to=20
Canada to join my family in 2002 and filed Canadian and US returns =
again.=20
This time I showed my US income in Canada. Last year I got re-assessment =
for=20
year 2001 and 2002. They asked only clearance for rent/property tax for =
2001=20
and details of my employment expenses for 2002. Now I do not know why =
they=20
refered my case to Ottawa international tax office. What do you think =
about=20
my 2000 and 2001 Canadian returns. Did I do right thing by not showing =
my US=20
income because I was not living in Canada or I did something wrong. If I =
did=20
wrong, what should I do now and how can I avoid the bad consequences. =
Will=20
they stick to the current assessment for employement expenses or they =
will=20
check the returns thoroughly. If they think I hide my US income from =
them,=20
how will I prove that I was right because I was living in States at that =
time and what kind of proof they will require to prove that I was living =
in=20
States. Was I right to file Canadian tax return for income generated =
from=20
Canada but I was living in States. At this moment I am totally confused =
and=20
need your help to get out of this situation. I heard that Ottawa takes =
three=20
to six months for investigation and I want some solution before they =
come to=20
conclusion.
Thank for sparing your priceless time for me.
IXXXXXXXXX
_________________________________________________________________
david ingram replies:
You may well have been correct to not report your US income on your =
Canadian return for 2000 and 2001 but i am willing to be that your =
returns are both very wrong.
What I am hearing is that you filed a Canadian return with Canadian =
income and claimed full exemptions in Canada and filed an American =
Return reporting only your US income and claimed full exemptions. =20
This is always wrong. If you were correct in leaving the US income off =
the Canadian Return, you should not have claimed full exemptions and the =
Canadian Income had to be included on your US return. The same things =
happens in reverse.
The governing factor is Article IV of the US / Canada Income Tax Treaty =
which I am repeating here for the second time in two days. However, you =
will need to sit down with someone like myself who understands the two =
country setup and you should do it soon.
If you are in BC, I would be pleased to help you, but there are no =
miracles. Goto www.centa.com and read the US/Canada Taxation section =
about a dozen times. It may/will help you understand how it works. I =
KNOW your returns are wrong now.
.
CANADA / UNITED STATES INCOME TAX TREATY 1980=20
Article IV - Fiscal Domicile - (it is the same number in most treaties) =
For the purposes of this Convention, the term "resident of a Contracting =
State" means any person who, under the law of that State, is liable to =
taxation therein by reason of that person's domicile, residence, =
citizenship, place of management, place of incorporation or any other =
criterion of a similar nature, but in the case of an estate or trust, =
only to the extent that income derived by the estate or trust is liable =
to tax in that State, either in its hands or in the hands of its =
beneficiaries. For the purposes of this paragraph, a person who is not a =
resident of Canada under this paragraph and who is a United States =
citizen or alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence =
(a "green card" holder) is a resident of the United States only if the =
individual has a substantial presence, permanent home or habitual abode =
in the United states and that individual's personal and economic =
relations are closer to the United states than any other third State. =
The term "resident" of a Contracting State is understood to include:=20
(a) the Government of that State or a political subdivision or local =
authority thereof or any agency or instrumentality of any such =
government, subdivision or authority, and=20
(b) (i) A trust, organization or other arrangement that is operated =
exclusively to administer or provide pension, retirement or employee =
benefits, and=20
(ii) A not-for-profit organization that was constituted in that =
State, and that is, by reason of its nature as such, generally exempt =
from income taxation in that State.=20
2. Where by reason of the provisions of paragraph 1 an individual is a =
resident of both Contracting States, then his status shall be determined =
as follows:=20
(a) he shall be deemed to be a resident of the Contracting State in =
which he has a permanent home available to him. If he has a permanent =
home available to him in both Contracting States, he shall be deemed to =
be a resident of the Contracting State with which his personal and =
economic relations are closer (centre of vital interests);=20
(b) if the Contracting State in which he has his centre of vital =
interests cannot be determined, or if he has not a permanent home =
available to him in either Contracting State, he shall be deemed to be a =
resident of the Contracting State in which he has an habitual abode;=20
(c) if he has an habitual abode in both Contracting States or in neither =
of them, he shall be deemed to be a resident of the Contracting State of =
which he is a national;=20
(d) if he is a national of both Contracting States or of neither of =
them, the competent authorities of the Contracting States shall settle =
the question by mutual agreement.=20
David Ingram's US/Canada Services
US / Canada / Mexico tax and working Visa Specialists
US / Canada Real Estate Specialists
108-100 Park Royal South
West Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7T 1A2
Calls accepted from 10 AM to 10 PM 7 days a week
Res (604) 980-3578 Cell (604) 657-8451
Bus (604) 980-0321=20
davidingram@shaw.ca
www.centa.com www.david-ingram.com
Disclaimer: This question has been answered without detailed =
information or consultation and is to be regarded only as general =
comment. Nothing in this message is or should be construed as advice =
in any particular circumstances. No contract exists between the reader & =
the author and any and all non-contractual duties are expressly denied. =
All readers should obtain formal advice from a competent financial, or =
real estate planner or advisor & appropriately qualified legal =
practitioner, tax or immigration specialist in connection with personal =
or business affairs such as at www.centa.com. If you forward this =
message, this disclaimer must be included."
This from "ask an income tax and immigration and bankruptcy expert" from =
www.centa.com or www.jurock.com or www.featureweb.com. Canadian David =
Ingram deals daily with tax returns dealing with expatriate:
multi jurisdictional cross and trans border expatriate problems for the =
United States, Canada, Mexico, Great Britain, the United Kingdom, =
Kuwait, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand, Indonesia, Egypt, =
Antarctica, Japan, China, New Zealand, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, =
Russia, Georgia, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Scotland, Ireland, =
Hawaii, Florida, Montana, Morocco, Israel, Iraq, Iran, India, Pakistan, =
Afghanistan, Mali, Bangkok, Greenland, Iceland, Cuba, Bahamas, Bermuda, =
Barbados, St Vincent, Grenada,, Virgin Islands, US, UK, GB, American and =
Canadian and Mexican and any of the 43 states with state tax returns, =
etc.
income tax wizard wizzard guru advisor specialist consultant taxman =
Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,=20
California, Colorado, Connecticut, =20
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida,=20
Garland, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky,=20
Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, =20
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, =20
Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, =20
Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey,=20
New Mexico,New York, North Carolina, =20
North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon.=20
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Rockwall,=20
South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, =20
Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia,=20
West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming,=20
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan,=20
Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec City,=20
New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island,=20
Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Yukon and=20
Northwest and Nunavit Territories, =20
Mount Vernon, Eumenclaw, Coos Bay=20
and Dallas Houston Rockwall Garland=20
Texas Taxman and Tax Guru and wizzard=20
wizard - Your name has been added to our email list because of an =
enquiry we have received, we may not answer your question but=20
another similar question will be as we lump them.
You may find more answers at www.centa.com
David Ingram of the CEN-TA REALTY Group
US / Canada / Mexico tax and working Visa Specialists
US / Canada Real Estate Specialists
108-100 Park Royal South
West Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7T 1A2
(604) 980-0321 - Fax 913-9123 taxman@centa.com
www.centa.com www.david-ingram.com
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.centa.com/CEN-TAPEDE/centapede/attachments/0d97cbdd/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
What's Related