CEN-TAPEDE] History of Fuel Cells and my opinion that
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment This from Ross McDonald - A CEN-TA Tax office operator and Realtor with = LIGHTHOUSE REALTY in Abbotsford BC =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Hi David, Interesting comments on the fuel cell fiasco. My sources in that = industry tell me that the fuel cell is a long way out for two reasons = =96 the cost of totally redesigning the cars from the ground up to = accommodate a totally different drive train is so high that the cost = conscious auto manufacturers are not going to jump on it. Instead they = are working to simply make the internal combustion engine run on = hydrogen =96 not nearly such a big switch over. I fact the biggest = problem is designing a fuel tank to hold the hydrogen =96 (my sibling = tells me his company has got patents on that however). The other problem is the issue of a hydrogen distribution system. In = order to get hydrogen we have to electrolyze water =96 ironically with = electricity generated by carbon based fuels =96 so in reality the = environmental savings are not all that great. Not to mention the = billions to convert the gas stations and the supply system currently in = place. =20 There is an Alternative however, =96 and this is where us lowly REALTORS = stand to change the future of our planet! Realtors need to convince the = public to buy houses that have roofs built of special solar panels that = use solar energy to convert water into hydrogen and oxygen by day and = then build up a reservoir of hydrogen in each separate house. =20 At night you simply refill your car from your =93Free=94 home supply of = hydrogen. Of course you can then use any excess capacity to heat your = home, run your appliances etc. Apparently this type of roof is now = available at a cost of about $25,000 above current construction = costs/methods. If that could save you $1000 per year in gas and $2000 = in home heating bills the pay back is little over 8 years =96 it now = becomes quite viable. Ross=20 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] = [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of = [email protected] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:56 PM To: CENTAPEDE Subject: Should Los Angeles lady cash in her Canadian = RRSPaccounts and bite the bullet - ask an income tax expert experts Hi David, You have been doing my taxes since I moved to Los Angeles 2 years = ago--thank you. =20 Gail Ritter suggested to me that after I graduate (Ph.D.) and before I = get my permanent residence here I should cash in my RRSPs. I have still = to find out more about my superannuation, but I looked today at my RRSPs = and they look terrible! Should I be optimistic enough to hang on to = them for another 3-4 years, or would I be wiser to sell, and if I do, = what kind of tax deduction, if any, would I get? Since I'm struggling = to make it through school with tuition at over $12,000 a year, tax = refunds, extra deductions, etc. are enormously valuable, and every time = I think I can pay down my credit card, or my line of credit, my = 11-year-old car needs a new battery, or new tires, or something! On the = other hand, at 55 I have no savings other than these RRSPs and the = superannuation (which will be very small because I worked part-time the = last few years of my job) and owe $22,000 Canadian borrowed for tuition = to date. Here is today's dismal picture of what I have (the time to get out of = Ballard was exactly when the account was being transferred and = inaccessible--talk about bad luck!). Any thoughts would be most welcome. I assume that if you post this on = the newsletter you will keep confidential the details of my dreadful = financial picture! CXXXXXX My Balances as of Friday, October 03, 2003=20 =20 =20 Cash Balance Market Value Equity =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 Canadian Balances (in Canadian Dollars)=20 $ 131.91 $ 4,832.00 $ 4,964.00 =20 Combined Balances (in Canadian Dollars)*=20 $ 131.91 $ 4,832.00 $ 4,964.00 =20 =20 =20 If you are holding Bonds in your portfolio, Accrued Interest may = or may not be included in this online Account Summary.=20 =20 * Total Account Values do not include securities held in = safekeeping. For example, if your account holds certain Canada Savings = Bonds their value is NOT reflected in the totals.=20 =20 Display In: Canadian Dollars Settlement Currency=20 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- My Canadian Positions (In Canadian Dollars) as of Friday, October = 03, 2003=20 Sort Alphabetically =20 Position Qty. Price Market Value Book Value Change =20 =20 COMMON SHARES=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 APPAREO SOFTWARE INC NEW=20 1,050 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,540.00 $ -1,540.00 - Action - Buy Sell Quick Quote = Detailed Quote Chart & First Call Snapshot Add to Watchlist=20 =20 BALLARD POWER SYSTEMS INC=20 150 $ 19.02 $ 2,853.00 $ 16,200.00 $ -13,347.00 - Action - Buy Sell Quick Quote = Detailed Quote Chart & First Call Snapshot Add to Watchlist=20 =20 FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGIES CORP=20 230 $ 0.52 $ 119.00 $ 1,025.90 $ -906.90 - Action - Buy Sell Quick Quote = Detailed Quote Chart & First Call Snapshot Add to Watchlist=20 =20 Sub-Total =20 =20 $ 2,972.00 $ 18,765.90 $ -15,793.90 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 MUTUAL FUNDS=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 C.I. GLOBAL SCIENCE & TECH SECTOR SHARES (203)=20 31.997 $ 11.06 $ 353.89 $ 1,430.00 $ -1,076.11 - Action - Buy Redeem Switch Quick = Quote Detailed Quote Fund Profile Chart Add to Watchlist=20 =20 FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO FUND C$ (DSC) (530)=20 48.634 $ 24.87 $ 1,209.53 $ 1,697.55 $ -488.02 - Action - Buy Redeem Switch Quick = Quote Detailed Quote Fund Profile Chart Add to Watchlist=20 =20 FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO FUND ISC (230)=20 13.509 $ 24.87 $ 335.97 $ 466.22 $ -130.25 - Action - Buy Redeem Switch Quick = Quote Detailed Quote Fund Profile Chart Add to Watchlist=20 =20 Sub-Total =20 =20 $ 1,899.39 $ 3,593.77 $ -1,694.38 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 Total value of all my Canadian Securities =20 =20 $ 4,871.39 $ 22,359.67 $ -17,488.28 =20 =20 =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D david ingram replies: My answer may surprize you because it means we charge you less after the = 2003 return but I have no problem giving it. You should cash in your RRSP. At the moment, it is too small to be = meaningful today. I do not think there is any chance that Ballard or = Fuel Cell Technologies will ever recover to their former glory and my = thought is that Ballard makes Bre-X look like a real gold mine. Making a = fuss about Ford or Daimler investing in Ballard was all window dressing. = Ford and Daimler did not invest in Ballard for any other reason than to = be onthe inside "just in case" Ballard did come up with something of = value. The Coleman deal has been a fiasco and my understanding is that = the Vancouver Test on the buses was a sheer waste of time for BC Transit = (or Caost Mountain Bus if you prefer). If you sell it now, you will pay Canada 25% tax. There will be no tax = to the USA. =20 That will give you a small nest egg to spend down at a $150 a month for = a year and make life a little better now when things are really tight. = In addition, although the reporting will be a pain this year (2003), you = will then not have to bother with the RRSP reporting rules in the = future. If nothing else, that makes your tax return preparation cheaper. I will use this as a CEN-TAPEDE but will do my best to disguise you as = usual. Thanks for writing. =20 david=20 David Ingram of the CEN-TA REALTY Group US / Canada / Mexico tax and working Visa Specialists US / Canada Real Estate Specialists 108-100 Park Royal South West Vancouver, BC, CANADA, V7T 1A2 (604) 980-0321 - Fax 913-9123 [email protected] www.centa.com www.david-ingram.com Disclaimer: This question has been answered without detailed = information or consultation and is to be regarded only as general = comment. Nothing in this message is or should be construed as advice = in any particular circumstances. No contract exists between the reader = and the author and any and all non-contractual duties are expressly = denied. All readers should obtain formal advice from a competent and = appropriately qualified legal practitioner or tax specialist in = connection with personal or business affairs such as at www.centa.com. = If you forward this message, this disclaimer must be included." Be ALERT, the world needs more "lerts" =20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.centa.com/CEN-TAPEDE/centapede/attachments/f2e3805b/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
What's Related